"Equity in Energy: How Wisconsin's Legal Framework Empowers Community Advocacy"
- Org Administration
- Jan 2
- 4 min read
In the realm of civil action, Walnut Way Conservation Corp's challenge against We Energies stands as a testament to the power of community advocacy and the principles of equity in law. The concept of standing, derived from Article III of the U.S. Constitution, provides the foundation for Walnut Way's ability to bring their case before the court. This legal doctrine requires that a party demonstrate an actual or imminent injury, causation, and the likelihood that a favorable court decision would remedy the harm.
Wisconsin law, rooted in the state's historical Court of Chancery, recognizes equity as a means to seek justice when traditional legal remedies fall short. This equitable jurisdiction allows courts to consider fairness and public interest, particularly relevant in cases involving complex regulatory environments and community impact, such as the ongoing dispute over We Energies' proposed gas plant projects.
Modern Application of Equity
Today, Wisconsin's courts have merged law and equity jurisdictions, allowing them to provide both legal and equitable remedies. This is reflected in the state's statutes and court practices:
Wisconsin Statutes: Chapter 196, which governs the regulation of public utilities, incorporates principles of equity in its framework for addressing complex regulatory issues.
Public Service Commission (PSC): The PSC, which oversees utility regulation, often considers equitable principles when making decisions about rate cases and other utility matters
Judicial Discretion: Wisconsin courts have the authority to apply equitable principles in cases where strict application of law might lead to unfair results, particularly in complex regulatory environments.
Court of Common Law
Common law courts traditionally dealt with civil breaches of peace and disputes involving monetary damages. In the context of Walnut Way's efforts:
If Walnut Way seeks monetary compensation for damages caused by WE Energies' actions, this would fall under common law jurisdiction.
Any claims related to breach of contract or tort law (such as nuisance or negligence) would typically be handled by common law courts.
Court of Chancery/Court of Equity
Equity courts, historically represented by the Court of Chancery, focus on providing remedies when common law is inadequate. For Walnut Way's efforts:
Injunctive relief: If Walnut Way aims to prevent, WE Energies from implementing certain projects, policies or rate increases, they might seek an injunction, which is an equitable remedy
Specific performance: If Walnut Way wants to compel, WE Energies to fulfill certain obligations, this equitable remedy could be applicable.
Declaratory judgments: Equity courts can clarify rights and obligations, which might be relevant if Walnut Way seeks clarification on WE Energies' responsibilities
.
Application to Walnut Way's Efforts
Walnut Way's advocacy for energy affordability and intervention in WE Energies' rate case aligns with principles of equity:
Disproportionate impact: Rate increases disproportionately affect low-income households, with energy burden in Black and Hispanic/Latinx neighborhoods roughly double that of predominantly white neighborhoods.
Public interest advocacy: Walnut Way champions programs like LIFT, which helps forgive arrears for low-income customers, serving the broader public good.
Complex regulatory landscape: The interplay between utility regulations, community needs, and environmental concerns necessitates a nuanced approach, especially regarding:
Natural gas plant conversions and their impact on rates and emissions
Recovery of costs for fossil fuel projects
Lack of an integrated resource plan to guide long-term energy decisions
Implementation of a Percentage of Income Payment Program, which is still under consideration
Affordability vs. utility interests: Despite We Energies' claims of below-average bills, regulators approved significant rate hikes (11.52% over two years), favoring utility investments over customer affordability.
Inadequate low-income protections: While programs like LIFT exist, their eligibility criteria and outreach efforts are often insufficient to address the scale of energy burden in affected communities.
As Walnut Way navigates this legal landscape, they can explore specific legal avenues to challenge decisions made by the Public Service Commission (PSC) that fail to adequately address equity concerns. This may involve filing appeals or petitions that highlight how PSC rulings disproportionately affect low-income households and undermine efforts for affordable energy. Additionally, mobilizing community members to participate in public hearings and comment periods is crucial. By educating residents about their rights and encouraging them to voice their experiences with rising utility costs, Walnut Way can amplify its advocacy efforts and ensure that the needs of vulnerable populations are represented.
While modern courts in the United States generally combine law and equity jurisdictions, the principles underlying these distinctions remain relevant. Walnut Way's efforts may involve both legal and equitable elements, depending on the specific remedies they seek and the nature of their claims against WE Energies.
As Walnut Way continues its advocacy efforts, several potential remedies could be pursued through legal channels to address the challenges posed by We Energies' rate increases. These include seeking an injunction against proposed rate hikes, demanding specific performance of affordability commitments, and pushing for the implementation of income-based payment programs. Additionally, advocating for a reduction in We Energies' authorized Return on Equity (ROE), expanding low-income assistance programs, and exploring the securitization of utility debt to minimize costs passed to ratepayers are crucial strategies to consider.
If you're concerned about rising energy costs and their impact on your community, now is the time to act. Contact your local representatives, join community advocacy groups like Walnut Way, and participate in public hearings on utility rate cases. By raising your voice and supporting these initiatives, you can help ensure that energy remains affordable and accessible for all residents, particularly those in low-income households. Together, we can work towards a more equitable energy future for Wisconsin.
Comments