top of page

Wisconsin's Energy Future Demands Judicial Intervention

Wisconsin's energy landscape is at a critical juncture, with the state lagging behind its neighbors in the transition to clean, renewable power. The Wisconsin Public Service Commission (WPSC), the state agency tasked with regulating utilities and overseeing energy policy, has proven unable to drive the reforms needed to modernize Wisconsin's energy system.

The WPSC's ineffectiveness stems from several factors, including utility capture, lack of political will, an outdated mandate, and weak public accountability. As a result, Wisconsin remains heavily reliant on fossil fuels, has some of the highest electricity rates in the Midwest, and is falling short of its own emissions reduction targets.

To overcome these barriers and resolve the issues the WPSC has been unable to address, stakeholders must turn to higher authorities, including the courts, to force action:

1. Judicial review: Aggrieved parties should challenge WPSC decisions that neglect the public interest in state courts. Lawsuits could argue that the WPSC has failed to fulfill its statutory duties, acted arbitrarily and capriciously, or violated constitutional rights. Courts have the power to overturn WPSC orders, compel action, and set binding precedent.

2. Federal court intervention: For matters that implicate federal law, such as the Clean Air Act or Federal Power Act, stakeholders could sue in federal court to invalidate WPSC decisions that conflict with national standards. Federal courts could also order the WPSC to comply with federal mandates, such as considering climate impacts in its decision-making.

3. State Supreme Court appeal: If lower courts uphold problematic WPSC decisions, stakeholders should appeal to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The high court could establish new legal principles that require the WPSC to prioritize environmental protection, consumer welfare, and the public interest over narrow utility concerns.

4. U.S. State Supreme Court review: For cases that raise constitutional issues or conflicts between state and federal law, ultimate appeal to the Supreme Court may be necessary. While rare, a Supreme Court ruling on the WPSC's duties could reverberate nationwide and redefine the role of state utility regulators.

Beyond the courts, stakeholders should also advocate for action by other higher authorities:

  • The governor should use executive powers to direct the WPSC to align its decisions with the state's clean energy goals.

  • The attorney general should investigate whether the WPSC has violated state laws or the constitution in its dealings with utilities.

  • FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) should assert its authority over interstate electricity issues to overrule WPSC decisions that undermine competitive markets or discriminate against clean energy.

  • The state legislature should exercise its oversight powers to hold the WPSC accountable and pass reforms to strengthen its public interest mission.

Wisconsinites deserve an energy system that is clean, reliable, affordable, and responsive to the public interest. For too long, the WPSC has been unable to deliver on that vision, hamstrung by utility influence, political timidity, and a lack of accountability.

It is time for the courts and other higher authorities to step in and set the WPSC on a new course. Judicial intervention is essential to ensure that Wisconsin's energy future is guided not by the profit motives of utilities, but by the law, science, and the public good. Only then can Wisconsin unleash the full potential of clean energy innovation and secure a sustainable and just energy system for generations to come.

74 views0 comments


Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page